Cuba vs Eswatini: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient

Cuba
8,142
in 2017
Eswatini
7,963
in 2017
Cuba rank
100th
Eswatini rank
101st

Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient over time

  • Cuba
  • Eswatini
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k182019182017

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 8,142 against 7,963 in Eswatini, a difference of 179.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1820 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 101st of 160 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 11 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Eswatini Difference Ahead
1820s 755.76 224.33 531.43 Cuba
1850s 888 196.76 691.24 Cuba
1870s 1,148 242.84 904.83 Cuba
1890s 1,640 242.84 1,397 Cuba
1910s 2,069 310.57 1,758 Cuba
1920s 2,507 524.84 1,982 Cuba
1950s 2,638 604 2,034 Cuba
1960s 2,994 783 2,211 Cuba
1970s 2,976 1,704 1,272 Cuba
1980s 4,106 2,946 1,160 Cuba
1990s 4,713 3,881 832 Cuba
2000s 4,362 5,381 1,020 Eswatini
2010s 7,360 7,578 218 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data, Cuba or Eswatini?
Cuba, at 8,142 against 7,963 in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data between Cuba and Eswatini?
179, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
15 years are reported by both, from 1820 to 2017.
How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data?
Cuba ranks 100th and Eswatini ranks 101st of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Eswatini: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid, drawing on Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 October 2026, from https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/cuba/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/cuba/eswatini/">Cuba vs Eswatini: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data
Source
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
160 places, 2,400 data points, 1820–2017
Last refreshed

In order to produce global estimates of historical poverty trends we have interpolated or extrapolated inequality data for missing observations. Green indicates observations of the Gini coefficient available in the original source.