Chile vs Latvia: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient

Chile
21,650
in 2017
Latvia
23,133
in 2017
Chile rank
49th
Latvia rank
46th

Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient over time

  • Chile
  • Latvia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k182019182017

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 23,133 against 21,650 in Chile, a difference of 1,483.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1820 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 46th of 160 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 7 and Latvia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Latvia Difference Ahead
1820s 824 938.3 114.3 Latvia
1850s 1,352 1,121 231.13 Chile
1870s 1,868 1,378 490.19 Chile
1890s 2,907 1,851 1,056 Chile
1910s 4,485 2,882 1,603 Chile
1920s 5,679 2,962 2,717 Chile
1950s 5,880 6,074 193.59 Latvia
1960s 6,781 8,432 1,651 Latvia
1970s 8,195 11,916 3,722 Latvia
1980s 9,024 13,739 4,715 Latvia
1990s 10,203 15,806 5,603 Latvia
2000s 16,174 14,190 1,984 Chile
2010s 20,280 20,136 143.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data, Chile or Latvia?
Latvia, at 23,133 against 21,650 in Chile as of 2017.
What is the difference in use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data between Chile and Latvia?
1,483, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1820 to 2017.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data?
Chile ranks 49th and Latvia ranks 46th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid, drawing on Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data
Source
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
160 places, 2,400 data points, 1820–2017
Last refreshed

In order to produce global estimates of historical poverty trends we have interpolated or extrapolated inequality data for missing observations. Green indicates observations of the Gini coefficient available in the original source.