Barbados vs China: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient

Barbados
12,061
in 2017
China
12,734
in 2017
Barbados rank
79th
China rank
77th

Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient over time

  • Barbados
  • China
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k182019182017

How they compare

China currently reports 12,734 against 12,061 in Barbados, a difference of 673.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1820 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 79th and China ranks 77th of 160 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China Difference Ahead
1820s 934.1 882 52.1 Barbados
1850s 1,098 858 239.54 Barbados
1870s 1,344 945 399.2 Barbados
1890s 1,558 964 594.24 Barbados
1910s 1,937 910.89 1,026 Barbados
1920s 2,599 1,003 1,596 Barbados
1950s 3,390 799 2,591 Barbados
1960s 5,316 1,057 4,259 Barbados
1970s 10,197 1,398 8,799 Barbados
1980s 12,318 1,930 10,388 Barbados
1990s 12,994 2,982 10,012 Barbados
2000s 12,490 5,678 6,811 Barbados
2010s 12,008 11,196 811.5 Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data, Barbados or China?
China, at 12,734 against 12,061 in Barbados as of 2017.
What is the difference in use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data between Barbados and China?
673, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China?
15 years are reported by both, from 1820 to 2017.
How do Barbados and China rank globally for use of interpolation and extrapolation on original gini coefficient data?
Barbados ranks 79th and China ranks 77th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data. Statizoid, drawing on Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 October 2026, from https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/barbados/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/use-of-interpolation-and-extrapolation-on-gini-data/barbados/china/">Barbados vs China: Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Use of interpolation and extrapolation on original Gini coefficient data
Source
Various sources (2020) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
160 places, 2,400 data points, 1820–2017
Last refreshed

In order to produce global estimates of historical poverty trends we have interpolated or extrapolated inequality data for missing observations. Green indicates observations of the Gini coefficient available in the original source.