Ecuador vs Palestine: Share of population: 2011 vs. 2017 prices … upper-middle
Ecuador
26.1%
in 2023
Palestine
21.9%
in 2016
Ecuador rank
48th
Palestine rank
51st
Share of population: 2011 vs. 2017 prices … upper-middle over time
- Ecuador
- Palestine
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 26.1% against 21.9% in Palestine, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times Palestine's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 48th and Palestine ranks 51st of 119 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.3% | 23.2% | 21.2% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 29.6% | 20.2% | 9.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population living on less than the upper-middle income poverty line: 2011 vs. 2017 prices, Ecuador or Palestine?
- Ecuador, at 26.1% against 21.9% in Palestine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in share of population living on less than the upper-middle income poverty line: 2011 vs. 2017 prices between Ecuador and Palestine?
- 4.2%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Palestine?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
- How do Ecuador and Palestine rank globally for share of population living on less than the upper-middle income poverty line: 2011 vs. 2017 prices?
- Ecuador ranks 48th and Palestine ranks 51st of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of population living on less than the upper-middle income poverty line: 2011 vs. 2017 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population living in households with an income or consumption below $5.50 per day.