Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP)

Low & middle income
12.5%
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
51.3%
in 2018
Low & middle income rank
6th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
8th

Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) over time

  • Low & middle income
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
20406080198120022024

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 51.3% against 12.5% in Low & middle income, a difference of 38.8%.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 4.1 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

Low & middle income ranks 6th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 14 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low & middle income Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 55.0% 73.5% 18.5% Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 38.1% 74.4% 36.3% Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 18.4% 51.4% 33.0% Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 ppp), Low & middle income or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 51.3% against 12.5% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
What is the difference in poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 ppp) between Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of?
38.8%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2018.
How do Low & middle income and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 ppp)?
Low & middle income ranks 6th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 8th of 14 groups.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP). Statizoid, drawing on World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/poverty-headcount-ratio-at-3-00-a-day-2021-ppp-percent-of-population/low-and-middle-income/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://poverty.statizoid.com/compare/poverty-headcount-ratio-at-3-00-a-day-2021-ppp-percent-of-population/low-and-middle-income/tanzania/">Low & middle income vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day (2021 PPP) (% of population)
Unit
% of population
Source
World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
137 places, 2,872 data points, 1963–2025
Last refreshed

Poverty headcount ratio at $3.00 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than $3.00 a day at 2021 purchasing power adjusted prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions.