Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$
Belarus
158.99
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
154.19
in 2023
Belarus rank
83rd
Equatorial Guinea rank
85th
Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$ over time
- Belarus
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 158.99 against 154.19 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.8.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Belarus ranks 83rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 85th of 194 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.51 | 76.6 | 31.09 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 112 | 160.11 | 48.11 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 128.84 | 151.7 | 22.86 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher out-of-pocket expenditure (oop) per capita in us$, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
- Belarus, at 158.99 against 154.19 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in out-of-pocket expenditure (oop) per capita in us$ between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
- 4.8, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for out-of-pocket expenditure (oop) per capita in us$?
- Belarus ranks 83rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 85th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOP) per capita in US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.