Ecuador vs Pakistan: Income share held by fourth 20%
Ecuador
21.2%
in 2025
Pakistan
21.3%
in 2024
Ecuador rank
97th
Pakistan rank
95th
Income share held by fourth 20% over time
- Ecuador
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 21.3% against 21.2% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Pakistan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 97th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 123 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 20.9% | 21.2% | 0.3% | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 20.7% | 20.6% | 0.1% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 19.6% | 21.0% | 1.4% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 21.1% | 21.2% | 0.0% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 22.2% | 21.3% | 0.9% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income share held by fourth 20%, Ecuador or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 21.3% against 21.2% in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in income share held by fourth 20% between Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 0.1%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for income share held by fourth 20%?
- Ecuador ranks 97th and Pakistan ranks 95th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Income share held by fourth 20%. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.