Colombia vs Mozambique: Income share held by fourth 20%
Colombia
19.3%
in 2024
Mozambique
18.8%
in 2022
Colombia rank
120th
Mozambique rank
123rd
Income share held by fourth 20% over time
- Colombia
- Mozambique
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 19.3% against 18.8% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 123rd of 123 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 18.4% | 18.2% | 0.2% | Colombia |
| 2000s | 18.8% | 19.4% | 0.6% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 20.0% | 17.9% | 2.0% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 18.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income share held by fourth 20%, Colombia or Mozambique?
- Colombia, at 19.3% against 18.8% in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in income share held by fourth 20% between Colombia and Mozambique?
- 0.5%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Mozambique?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Colombia and Mozambique rank globally for income share held by fourth 20%?
- Colombia ranks 120th and Mozambique ranks 123rd of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Income share held by fourth 20%. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.