Austria vs Netherlands: Income share held by fourth 20%
Austria
22.5%
in 2023
Netherlands
22.5%
in 2021
Austria rank
37th
Netherlands rank
37th
Income share held by fourth 20% over time
- Austria
- Netherlands
How they compare
Austria currently reports 22.5% against 22.5% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Netherlands ahead.
Austria ranks 37th and Netherlands ranks 37th of 123 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.7% | 23.1% | 0.4% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 22.7% | 22.4% | 0.3% | Austria |
| 2010s | 22.9% | 22.4% | 0.5% | Austria |
| 2020s | 22.9% | 22.5% | 0.4% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income share held by fourth 20%, Austria or Netherlands?
- Austria, at 22.5% against 22.5% in Netherlands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in income share held by fourth 20% between Austria and Netherlands?
- 0.0%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Netherlands?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2021.
- How do Austria and Netherlands rank globally for income share held by fourth 20%?
- Austria ranks 37th and Netherlands ranks 37th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Income share held by fourth 20%. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.