Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus

Belarus: Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 units per US$ of GDP
Change on year
up 10.4%
World rank
86th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2003
All-time low
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2014
Years of data
21
2003–2023

Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 2003–2023

000002003201320232003: 0 units per US$ of GDP2004: 0 units per US$ of GDP2005: 0 units per US$ of GDP2006: 0 units per US$ of GDP2007: 0 units per US$ of GDP2008: 0 units per US$ of GDP2009: 0 units per US$ of GDP2010: 0 units per US$ of GDP2011: 0 units per US$ of GDP2012: 0 units per US$ of GDP2013: 0 units per US$ of GDP2014: 0 units per US$ of GDP2015: 0 units per US$ of GDP2016: 0 units per US$ of GDP2017: 0 units per US$ of GDP2018: 0 units per US$ of GDP2019: 0 units per US$ of GDP2020: 0 units per US$ of GDP2021: 0 units per US$ of GDP2022: 0 units per US$ of GDP2023: 0 units per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

Belarus recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.4% on the previous year and up 2.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp in Belarus peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2014.

Belarus ranks 86th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus, 2003 to 2023.
Year units per US$ of GDP Change
2003 0 units per US$ of GDP
2004 0 units per US$ of GDP -23.2%
2005 0 units per US$ of GDP -21.2%
2006 0 units per US$ of GDP -18.1%
2007 0 units per US$ of GDP -16.3%
2008 0 units per US$ of GDP -22.3%
2009 0 units per US$ of GDP +1.6%
2010 0 units per US$ of GDP -16.6%
2011 0 units per US$ of GDP -18.0%
2012 0 units per US$ of GDP -0.2%
2013 0 units per US$ of GDP -11.5%
2014 0 units per US$ of GDP -7.4%
2015 0 units per US$ of GDP +43.0%
2016 0 units per US$ of GDP +18.8%
2017 0 units per US$ of GDP -15.7%
2018 0 units per US$ of GDP -6.1%
2019 0 units per US$ of GDP -9.4%
2020 0 units per US$ of GDP -1.1%
2021 0 units per US$ of GDP -8.3%
2022 0 units per US$ of GDP -9.4%
2023 0 units per US$ of GDP +10.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 7
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 83 Slovenia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 84 Papua New Guinea 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 85 Congo 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 87 Niger 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 88 Macau, China 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 89 Luxembourg 0 units per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More poverty & inequality data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp in Belarus?
Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp in Belarus was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2003.
What is the lowest tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2014.
How does Belarus rank for tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp?
Belarus ranks 86th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
Is tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://poverty.statizoid.com/stat/tax-revenues-vs-income-inequality-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://poverty.statizoid.com/stat/tax-revenues-vs-income-inequality-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/">Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tax revenues vs income inequality divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tax revenues vs income inequality ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,244 data points, 1980–2023
Last refreshed

Tax revenues vs income inequality divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.