Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Poland
Poland: Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Poland, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Poland stood at 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.8% on the previous year and down 17.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Poland peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2018.
That places Poland 153rd out of 178 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More poverty & inequality data for Poland
- Data deprivation poverty surveys per decade 8 (2025)
- Fertility rate vs the share living in extreme poverty 1.3 (2023)
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty 4,895 (2023)
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, annual growth rate 0.6829 % change on previous year (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled 35.13 (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality 35.13 (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, annual growth rate 2.18 % change on previous year (2023)
- Gender inequality index from the human development report 0.081 (2023)
- Share of government consumption in gdp vs share in extreme poverty 22.39 (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Poland?
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Poland was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1990.
- What is the lowest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2018.
- How does Poland rank for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp?
- Poland ranks 153rd out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.