Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Lithuania
Lithuania: Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, 1995–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Lithuania is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 29 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 12.6% on the previous year and down 34.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Lithuania peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
Lithuania ranks 80th of 178 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +22.6% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.5% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +27.8% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -21.3% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -43.1% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +31.4% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.0% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +34.0% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +33.5% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -18.3% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -35.6% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +20.9% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +19.6% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -28.8% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.5% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 2.6× the median. (57 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0 units per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 units per US$ of GDP, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More poverty & inequality data for Lithuania
- Number of income/consumption surveys in the past decade available via the World Bank 8 surveys (2025)
- Number of income/consumption surveys in the past decade available via 0 surveys per person (2025)
- Number of income/consumption surveys in the past decade available via 0 surveys per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fertility rate vs. share living in extreme poverty 1.2 live births per woman (2023)
- Cereal yield vs. share in extreme poverty 4,187 kg per hectare (2023)
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, annual growth rate -0.5439 % change on previous year (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled 32.6 (2023)
- Tax revenue as share of GDP vs. income inequality 32.6% (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, annual growth rate 3.41 % change on previous year (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Lithuania?
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Lithuania was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Lithuania rank for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 80th out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cereal yield vs. share in extreme poverty Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.