Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Canada
Canada: Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023. ▼ Falling
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP in Canada, 1990–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Canada is 0 units per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 9.3% on the previous year and down 25.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Canada peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2021.
Canada ranks 171st of 178 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 34 years of available data.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Canada
More poverty & inequality data for Canada
- Data deprivation poverty surveys per decade 7 (2025)
- Fertility rate vs the share living in extreme poverty 1.35 (2023)
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty 3,695 (2023)
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, annual growth rate -9.41 % change on previous year (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled 34.78 (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality 34.78 (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Tax revenues vs income inequality, annual growth rate 2.8 % change on previous year (2023)
- Gender inequality index from the human development report 0.052 (2023)
- Share of government consumption in gdp vs share in extreme poverty 21.17 (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Canada?
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp in Canada was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1993.
- What is the lowest cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2021.
- How does Canada rank for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 171st out of 178 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 25.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 34 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cereal yield vs extreme poverty Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.