Eritrea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tax revenue as share of GDP vs. income inequality
Eritrea
19.5%
in 2002
Saint Kitts and Nevis
19.3%
in 2023
Eritrea rank
95th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
98th
Tax revenue as share of GDP vs. income inequality over time
- Eritrea
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 19.5% against 19.3% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th of 187 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.4% | 16.9% | 5.5% | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 19.2% | 17.8% | 1.4% | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenue as share of gdp vs. income inequality, Eritrea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Eritrea, at 19.5% against 19.3% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2002.
- What is the difference in tax revenue as share of gdp vs. income inequality between Eritrea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2002.
- How do Eritrea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tax revenue as share of gdp vs. income inequality?
- Eritrea ranks 95th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 98th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNU-WIDER Government Revenue Dataset (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue as share of GDP vs. income inequality. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Taxes include direct and indirect taxes as well as social contributions. The Gini coefficient measures inequality on a scale from 0 to 1. Higher values indicate higher inequality.