Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Zimbabwe
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2021
Cuba rank
99th
Zimbabwe rank
98th
Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Cuba ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 99th and Zimbabwe ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenues vs income inequality, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tax revenues vs income inequality divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.