Democratic Republic of Congo vs Sri Lanka: Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled
Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 9.85 against 9.33 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.52.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 162nd and Sri Lanka ranks 160th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9925 | 12.3 | 11.3 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 4.56 | 11.71 | 7.15 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 8.06 | 11.01 | 2.95 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 8.72 | 8.21 | 0.5107 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 9.85 against 9.33 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 0.52, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Sri Lanka rank globally for tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 162nd and Sri Lanka ranks 160th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenues vs income inequality, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tax revenues vs income inequality with 52 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.