Luxembourg vs Tajikistan: Relative poverty: Share of population below 60% of the median
Luxembourg
20.5%
in 2023
Tajikistan
20.8%
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
38th
Tajikistan rank
35th
Relative poverty: Share of population below 60% of the median over time
- Luxembourg
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 20.8% against 20.5% in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 38th and Tajikistan ranks 35th of 120 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 16.1% | 15.7% | 0.4% | Luxembourg |
| 2000s | 17.1% | 17.2% | 0.1% | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 18.6% | 19.1% | 0.5% | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 21.6% | 20.2% | 1.4% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher relative poverty: share of population below 60% of the median, Luxembourg or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 20.8% against 20.5% in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in relative poverty: share of population below 60% of the median between Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 0.3%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tajikistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Tajikistan rank globally for relative poverty: share of population below 60% of the median?
- Luxembourg ranks 38th and Tajikistan ranks 35th of 120 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Poverty and Inequality Platform (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Relative poverty: Share of population below 60% of the median. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of population living in households with an income or consumption below 60% of the median.