Peru vs Philippines: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Peru
- Philippines
How they compare
Peru currently reports 6.9% against 6.2% in Philippines, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Philippines ahead.
Peru ranks 6th and Philippines ranks 7th of 68 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.7% | 16.1% | 6.4% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 7.6% | 0.9% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Peru or Philippines?
- Peru, at 6.9% against 6.2% in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Peru and Philippines?
- 0.7%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Philippines rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Peru ranks 6th and Philippines ranks 7th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.