Israel vs Türkiye: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Israel
- Türkiye
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0.3% against 0.2% in Türkiye, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.5 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Türkiye ahead.
Israel ranks 56th and Türkiye ranks 58th of 68 countries.
Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.9% | 1.6% | 0.7% | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 0.5% | 0.9% | 0.4% | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Israel or Türkiye?
- Israel, at 0.3% against 0.2% in Türkiye as of 2022.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Israel and Türkiye?
- 0.1%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Türkiye?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Israel and Türkiye rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Israel ranks 56th and Türkiye ranks 58th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.