France vs Mongolia: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
France
1.3%
in 2023
Mongolia
1.3%
in 2022
France rank
33rd
Mongolia rank
33rd
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- France
- Mongolia
How they compare
France currently reports 1.3% against 1.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
France ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 33rd of 68 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1% | 3.4% | 2.3% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 1.3% | 0.2% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), France or Mongolia?
- France, at 1.3% against 1.3% in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between France and Mongolia?
- 0.0%, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do France and Mongolia rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- France ranks 33rd and Mongolia ranks 33rd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.