France vs Germany: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
France
1.3%
in 2023
Germany
1.3%
in 2022
France rank
33rd
Germany rank
33rd
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- France
- Germany
How they compare
France currently reports 1.3% against 1.3% in Germany, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was France ahead.
France ranks 33rd and Germany ranks 33rd of 68 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.8% | France |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.0% | 0.2% | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), France or Germany?
- France, at 1.3% against 1.3% in Germany as of 2023.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between France and Germany?
- 0.0%, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Germany?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do France and Germany rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- France ranks 33rd and Germany ranks 33rd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.