Cyprus vs Japan: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Cyprus
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 1.2% against 1.0% in Cyprus, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Cyprus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 40th and Japan ranks 39th of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.7% | 0.9% | 0.8% | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 1.1% | 1.2% | 0.1% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Cyprus or Japan?
- Japan, at 1.2% against 1.0% in Cyprus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Cyprus and Japan?
- 0.2%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Japan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Cyprus and Japan rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Cyprus ranks 40th and Japan ranks 39th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.