Cyprus vs Hungary: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Cyprus
1.0%
in 2023
Hungary
1.0%
in 2017
Cyprus rank
40th
Hungary rank
40th
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Cyprus
- Hungary
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1.0% against 1.0% in Hungary, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 40th and Hungary ranks 40th of 68 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6% | 0.1% | 2.5% | Cyprus |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 0.8% | 1.1% | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Cyprus or Hungary?
- Cyprus, at 1.0% against 1.0% in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Cyprus and Hungary?
- 0.0%, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Hungary?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
- How do Cyprus and Hungary rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Cyprus ranks 40th and Hungary ranks 40th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.