Costa Rica vs Cyprus: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Costa Rica
- Cyprus
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1.0% against 0.8% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 43rd and Cyprus ranks 40th of 68 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.6% | 1.7% | 0.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 2.2% | 1.0% | 1.2% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Costa Rica or Cyprus?
- Cyprus, at 1.0% against 0.8% in Costa Rica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Costa Rica and Cyprus?
- 0.2%, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cyprus?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Costa Rica and Cyprus rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Costa Rica ranks 43rd and Cyprus ranks 40th of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.