Chile vs Norway: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Chile
0.4%
in 2024
Norway
0.4%
in 2022
Chile rank
52nd
Norway rank
52nd
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Chile
- Norway
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.4% against 0.4% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 52nd and Norway ranks 52nd of 68 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.0% | 1.4% | 0.4% | Norway |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 0.4% | 1.2% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Chile or Norway?
- Chile, at 0.4% against 0.4% in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Chile and Norway?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Chile and Norway rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Chile ranks 52nd and Norway ranks 52nd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.