Armenia vs Denmark: Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank)
Armenia
0.8%
in 2024
Denmark
0.8%
in 2023
Armenia rank
43rd
Denmark rank
43rd
Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) over time
- Armenia
- Denmark
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in Denmark, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 43rd and Denmark ranks 43rd of 68 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.8% | 0.9% | 1.9% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 0.8% | 1.1% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank), Armenia or Denmark?
- Armenia, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank) between Armenia and Denmark?
- 0.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Denmark?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Denmark rank globally for multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (world bank)?
- Armenia ranks 43rd and Denmark ranks 43rd of 68 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The multidimensional poverty headcount ratio (World Bank) is the percentage of a population living in poverty according to the World Bank's Multidimensional Poverty Measure. The Multidimensional Poverty Measure includes three dimensions – monetary poverty, education, and basic infrastructure services – to capture a more complete picture of poverty.