Latvia vs Serbia: Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index

Latvia
0.812
in 2023
Serbia
0.772
in 2023
Latvia rank
35th
Serbia rank
38th

Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index over time

  • Latvia
  • Serbia
00.20.40.60.8201020162023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.812 against 0.772 in Serbia, a difference of 0.04.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 38th of 163 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Serbia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.7821 0.7116 0.0706 Latvia
2020s 0.8018 0.7548 0.047 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher inequality-adjusted human development index, Latvia or Serbia?
Latvia, at 0.812 against 0.772 in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in inequality-adjusted human development index between Latvia and Serbia?
0.04, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for inequality-adjusted human development index?
Latvia ranks 35th and Serbia ranks 38th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNDP, Human Development Report (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index
Source
UNDP, Human Development Report (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
166 places, 2,131 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) is a summary measure of key dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, a good education, and a decent standard of living, adjusted for inequalities in these dimensions. Higher values indicate higher and more equal human development.