Indonesia vs Lithuania: Income share held by second 20%
Indonesia
11.9%
in 2025
Lithuania
11.9%
in 2023
Indonesia rank
66th
Lithuania rank
66th
Income share held by second 20% over time
- Indonesia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 11.9% against 11.9% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 66th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 121 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.6% | 12.6% | 0.0% | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 12.7% | 12.3% | 0.4% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 11.1% | 12.0% | 0.9% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 11.6% | 11.8% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher income share held by second 20%, Indonesia or Lithuania?
- Indonesia, at 11.9% against 11.9% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in income share held by second 20% between Indonesia and Lithuania?
- 0.0%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Lithuania?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Indonesia and Lithuania rank globally for income share held by second 20%?
- Indonesia ranks 66th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank, Poverty and Inequality Platform. Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. Data for high-income econ, published as Income share held by second 20%. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding.