Latvia vs North Macedonia: Gini coefficient: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank
Latvia
0.4247
in 2022
North Macedonia
0.4112
in 2018
Latvia rank
79th
North Macedonia rank
81st
Gini coefficient: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank over time
- Latvia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.4247 against 0.4112 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0135.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1988 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Latvia ranks 79th and North Macedonia ranks 81st of 109 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.281 | 0.3872 | 0.1062 | North Macedonia |
| 1990s | 0.3998 | 0.4705 | 0.0707 | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 0.4157 | 0.4295 | 0.0138 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 0.4272 | 0.4369 | 0.0098 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gini coefficient: world inequality database vs. world bank, Latvia or North Macedonia?
- Latvia, at 0.4247 against 0.4112 in North Macedonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gini coefficient: world inequality database vs. world bank between Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 0.0135, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and North Macedonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and North Macedonia rank globally for gini coefficient: world inequality database vs. world bank?
- Latvia ranks 79th and North Macedonia ranks 81st of 109 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Inequality Database (WID.world) (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Gini coefficient: World Inequality Database vs. World Bank. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Gini coefficient measures inequality on a scale from 0 to 1. Higher values indicate higher inequality. Inequality is measured here in terms of income after taxes and benefits.