Armenia vs Iceland: Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP
Armenia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Armenia rank
65th
Iceland rank
63rd
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP over time
- Armenia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Armenia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 65th and Iceland ranks 63rd of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp, Armenia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp between Armenia and Iceland?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Iceland rank globally for cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of gdp?
- Armenia ranks 65th and Iceland ranks 63rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereal yield vs extreme poverty, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereal yield vs extreme poverty divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.