Latvia vs Sud: At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded)
Latvia
28.2%
in 2025
Sud
43.5%
in 2025
Latvia rank
6th
Sud rank
6th
At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded) over time
- Latvia
- Sud
How they compare
Sud currently reports 43.5% against 28.2% in Latvia, a difference of 15.3%.
That makes Sud's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Sud has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 6th and Sud ranks 6th of 45 countries.
Sud has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sud | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.5% | 40.0% | 11.5% | Sud |
| 2010s | 27.6% | 40.1% | 12.5% | Sud |
| 2020s | 29.0% | 45.0% | 16.0% | Sud |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher at-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded), Latvia or Sud?
- Sud, at 43.5% against 28.2% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in at-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded) between Latvia and Sud?
- 15.3%, with Sud ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sud?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Sud rank globally for at-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded)?
- Latvia ranks 6th and Sud ranks 6th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as At-risk-of-poverty rate before social transfers (pensions excluded from social transfers) by NUTS 2 region. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.